-
Our lawyersMeet our team
-
Our approachLearn more about what we do
-
Guides to doing business in AfricaGuides designed to offer a high legal overview of key legal issues in Africa
-
Soins privés et assurance maladie: vers un nécessaire rééquilibrage du modèle
-
Electronic Transactions Reform in Mauritius: Key Legal and Commercial Implications
-
Enforcement of Judgments Law Guide - The Mauritius Chapter
-
Jassi St Expedit Ltee v The Registrar General (ARC/RG/163-22)
-
Failure to Prevent: The New Corporate Crime Regime under the FCC Act
-
Year 2025 Assessment Of Amendments To Our Labour Laws – “2025: A Year of Rare Stability in the Workers’ Rights Act 2019”
-
Judicial Review - The 45-Day Rule: From Judicial Discretion to Legislative Certainty
-
L’intégration du principe de l’imprévision dans le droit mauricien : une réforme nécessaire pour un équilibre contractuel
-
Intellectual Property v/s Artificial Intelligence: Who owns creativity?
-
EOS Mascarenes Ltd v The Mauritius Commercial Bank Limited (2025 SCJ 114) - The Duty of Care in Banking
-
Data Protection and the BPO sector
-
Mooradally B. N. v Gunessee R. & Ors (2025 SCJ 62): Le principe de non-cumulThe case of Mooradally B. N. v Gunessee R. & Ors (2025 SCJ 62) involved a tragic medical negligence claim: a young woman died after liposuction surgery. Her mother initiated proceedings against the surgeon, clinic, and anaesthetist, arguing that they had breached their contractual obligations and had acted negligently. The judgment has clarified the circumstances under which a plaintiff can base a claim on tort when a contractual relationship exists, particularly in medical negligence cases.
